Males and females occupy distinct reproductive roles and therefore frequently show strong divergence in their fitness interests. This antagonism, known as sexual conflict, is thought to be a common feature of many sexually reproducing species and a pervasive force for evolutionary change, driving the evolution of sex differences and mating behaviours. We are working on theoretical population genetic and evolutionary game theory models to study the outcomes of sexual conflicts in the presence of different population ecologies, such as variation in mating systems and patterns of limited dispersal, and we are especially focused on the consequences of conflict for demography and the distribution of genetic variation. For example, we have recently modelled the evolution of sexually antagonistic alleles (genes that improve the fitness when expressed in one sex but deleterious when expressed in the other) under different modes of dispersal. We found that if the sexes disperse at different rates, antagonistic alleles favouring the less philopatric sex are more likely to fix as that sex experiences weaker kin competition, therefore showing that social ecology can direct patterns of sexually antagonistic genetic variation.
In the image, high fitness red deer stags have been shown to produce on average lower fitness daughters, indicating the presence of sexually antagonistic genes in this species (Foerster et al, 2007, Nature). Image by Diana Parkhouse.